SKU: 50413735290

Charles Wuorinen - Time's Encomium (For Synthesized & Processed Synthesized Sound) (LP, Album)

Sale price$12.59 Regular price$13.99
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Charles Wuorinen - Time's Encomium (For Synthesized & Processed Synthesized Sound) (LP, Album)Media Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+) Sleeve Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+) Comments: OG inner sleeve Price tag General notes about this release (please note: our version may differ a little. see the comments above): Time's Encomium was composed and realized between January 1968 and January 1969, at the Columbia Princeton Electronic Music Center in New York. a Nonesuch Records commission This data (when provided) is identical to other releases and

Media Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+)
Sleeve Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+)

Comments:
OG inner sleeve // Price tag

General notes about this release (please note: our version may differ a little. see the comments above):
Time's Encomium was composed and realized between January 1968 and January 1969, at the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center in New York. a Nonesuch Records commission This data (when provided) is identical to other releases and confirmed as valid. The composition won a Pulitzer prize but this is not in evidence in releases produced prior to this award. DETAIL OF THIS RELEASE On THIS release the Matrix/Run-out data is faint and difficult to photograph, but sufficiently legible to interpret as stated: "ARC" is the pressing facility: Allentown Record Co. Inc. The "Pete Helffrich" signature seems illegible but his identity is known and associated with ARC in numerous other examples. The "7-26-69" follows closely but only the first digit is debatable. This is the date of production. Whole some releases have distinctly-different label designs, others are identical or nearly-so. For the latter. subtle differences with the placement of print on the labels were also examined closely. Variations may be seem with the precise location of print on either side of the spindle in relation to the inner circle of the vinyl. At this time the variations observed may be attributed to the placement of identical labels in slightly different positions. In THIS release: Side A, left side, the "S" of "STEREO" and the "H" of the catalog number begin just inside the circle, and on the right side, the "EO" and ":53" cross the line. Side B, left side, the "S" of "STEREO" and the "H" of the catalog number fall on the line itself, and on the right side, the "E" also falls on the line, and the ":" just inside it. COMPARISONS WITH OTHER RELEASES: THIS release may be identical to [r5229679 Label print placement is one small variant, but the primary reason to a new submission is in the matrix run-out data, which is probably the same (but misread). It states: Side A: H 71225 A Pete Helffrig ARC725-4 Side B: H 71225 B Pete Helffrig ARC725-9 Compared with "ARC 7-26-69" as seem for both sides of THIS release, the missing dashes and "6" of "69" are a concern, but misreading "6" as "5" and "9" as "4" could easily be done. Or might two lacquers have been cut on consecutive days, the 25th and 26th of July, 1969? These are likely to be the identical release, but until the other contributor can verify this proposed correction, it seems inappropriate to overwrite my data on theirs. Therefore THIS one is submitted separately for comparison. COMPARISON WITH OTHER RELEASES Side A of [r216339 shifts the placement of the words one character left. This could be a variance in production, not design. But this release credits Bob Ludwig as the mastering engineer -- clearly contradicted by the data of THIS release. [a271098 [r9578476 has a completely new set of production credits: "Lacquer Cut At – Masterdisk" "Lacquer Cut At – Sterling Sound" "Pressed By – Specialty Records Corporation" [r5681619 is identified as a 1970 repressing with Side B remastered by Bob Ludwig: "Matrix / Runout (Side A Runout): H 71225 A Pete Helffrich" "Matrix / Runout (Side B Runout): H-7̶1̶2̶5̶5̶-B RE-1 71225 B STERLING RL" [r9237218 also admits to a 1970 origin (but not as a repressing), and provides yet another variation on the matrix/runout data: "(Runout etching side A): H 71225 A 2590 002 A-1 Pete Helffrig" "(Runout etching side B): 2590 002 B-1 H 71225 B Pete Helffrig" [r5230703 is identified as a repressing and belongs to a different family of label designs. [r5319760 is identified as a Canadian reissue by WEA Music Of Canada, Ltd. [r3768523 is designated as a UK release, and lacks label images, production credits, and deadwax data.

 

. Time's Encomium

 

Barcode and Other Identifiers:

Matrix / Runout H 71225 A Pete Helffrig ARC725-4
Matrix / Runout H 71225 B Pete Helffrig ARC725-9
Matrix / Runout H 71125 A ... Pete Helffrich ... ARC 7-26-69
Matrix / Runout H 71125 B ... Pete Helffrich ... ARC 7-26-69

 

Recorded At Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center
Pressed By Allentown Record Co. Inc.

Data provided by Discogs
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 50413735290

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 495 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
V
Verified Purchase
Valerie
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent sunscreen for daily sun protection...
This is a great sunscreen for the "light" days in the sun. I layer my skincare (serums, creams, then sunscreen) before I apply my makeup. Sunscreen is always the last step before I apply my makeup. Other brands have been known to "bead up" under my makeup through out the day, or have a white cast to them. This does not do that. It doesn't leave a white cast, or residue of any kind on my skin. It is lightweight to the point of being weightless right after application. It is incredibly moisturizing on my dry skin as well, which I LOVE! Love the ingredients too for everyday use! The only downside to this sunscreen is it isn't strong enough to protect my skin on days I am in the sun a lot and cannot reapply every hour, or so. I noticed a couple of stubborn brown spots pop up after a couple hours in direct sunlight. I didn't burn, but I did get a tan on my face I was hoping to avoid. All in all, This is my favorite sunscreen I use when I am running to-and-fro, but not the sunscreen I will use at the ball field, or a day at the beach.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2015
D
Verified Purchase
d_papa
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
A little pricey but worth it
I LOVE THIS SO MUCH. I have really sensitive skin and eczema, and am allergic to scented liquid soaps, detergents and creams. I got a sample of this in a subscription box, and fell in LOVE after I tested just a little on my hand at first. Now I've ordered multiple time, and even shipped some to my mom! It feels luxurious but also fresh and natural on your face, I put it on as a moisturizer, hit some concealer under my eyes, swipe some mascara on and am good to go - it feels like a whole skin-care routine in one go. The size is a little small for the price, but it's light, non-irritating, and refreshing. I think it's definitely worth it if you have sensitive skin and want sun protection without a load of chemicals on your face. I put a picture of what it looks like on my hand reflected in some light - it's slightly greasy at first, but it dries nice and soft afterwards, I still feel like my pores can breathe. I usually don't write product reviews, but after I ordered my 3rd batch I felt I should share. *One other thing to note - make sure you read the label if you want the specific scented one, I accidentally ordered the unscented one when I wanted the cucumber because the packaging looks the same and the label is in the scripty font and I missed it when I made a rushed order.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2019
I
Verified Purchase
Isabella
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Great for sensitive skin
Scent: Fragrance Free, Size: 1.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I usually have problems with fragrance in almost any face cream or sunscreen, and my skin reacts very easily, so I’m always careful with what I use. I tried the COOLA Organic Face Sunscreen SPF 50 Sunblock Lotion (Fragrance Free) and I’m honestly impressed. It feels very light on the skin, doesn’t irritate my face at all, and finally a sunscreen that doesn’t have that strong smell that usually bothers me. It absorbs well, works great under makeup, and gives good daily protection without feeling greasy. If you have sensitive skin or issues with fragrance like I do, this one is definitely worth trying.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
JENNIFER M. MANNING
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Love this sunscreen
Scent: Fragrance Free, Size: 1.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I would love to buy again, but I go through sunscreen, I have to find a little less expensive one. No burn, dewy not greasy look. Great for mature skin. No fragrance, works well, melts right in the skin. I do love this product and the spray too!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
N
Verified Purchase
NJ Girl
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Light and works with no eye stinging.
Scent: White Tea, Size: 1.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I love this sunscreen. I wear co tact’s and most sunscreen ends ups burning my eyes. This does not! It has a nice cucumber smell and it’s not sticky or heavy. By far the best face sunscreen that’s light, smells nice, doesn’t burn my eyes and works.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026

recommand products