SKU: 73222231368

BGA Stabiliser Drop Link Front Right fits Alfa Romeo 145 1994-2001

Sale price$10.79 Regular price$11.99
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 14 - Jul 19

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

BGA Stabiliser Drop Link Front Right fits Alfa Romeo 145 1994-2001Description This BGA Inner Tie Rod (Part Number SR2201) is OE quality replacement, supplied for direct fitment to compatible vehicles. Specifications Brand BGA Part Type Inner Tie Rod Position Front Right Fitting Position Front Axle Right Thread Size M10x1. 25 Thread Size 1 M14x1. 5 Manufacturer Part Number SR2201 Vehicle Compatibility Use the vehicle compatibility checker above to confirm fitment to your registration. This part fits the following

Description

This BGA Inner Tie Rod (Part Number SR2201) is OE-quality replacement, supplied for direct fitment to compatible vehicles.

Specifications

Brand BGA
Part Type Inner Tie Rod
Position Front Right
Fitting Position Front Axle Right
Thread Size M10x1.25
Thread Size 1 M14x1.5
Manufacturer Part Number SR2201

Vehicle Compatibility

Use the vehicle compatibility checker above to confirm fitment to your registration. This part fits the following vehicles:

Make Model Years
Alfa Romeo 145 (930_) 1994-2001

OEM References

This part is a direct OE-quality replacement for the following original equipment manufacturer part numbers:

Make Reference
Alfa Romeo 9947371, 9947714, 9947719, 9950774, 9950786
Fiat 46527567, 98845030, 9947714, 9947719, 9948293
Lancia 36025746, 46527567, 9947714, 9947726

Why Buy BGA?

BGA is a trusted name in OE-quality replacement parts. Every component is manufactured to original equipment standards, providing reliable performance, exact fitment and long service life.

  • OE-quality construction
  • Tested to manufacturer specifications
  • Trusted by professional workshops
  • Backed by manufacturer warranty
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 73222231368

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 127 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
M
Madrugada Mistral
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 1
Not what I was hoping for
Format: Paperback
I've been interested in the topic of religious appropriation ever since I saw my non-Tibetan neighbor hang Tibetan prayer flags on his front porch. And when I lived in Japan, I saw that non-Christian Japanese appropriated all of the trappings of Western Christian wedding ceremonies. So I had high hopes for this book. But it reads like a very looooong, and also very academic sermon on the evils of capitalism, western hegemony, and other such terms. There is not an ounce of humor in any of this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Benjamin Herzog
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Fascinating and well written
Format: Hardcover
This is one of those books that makes you re-see everyday things with new awareness and a more critical eye. Well-researched, organized and written. Highly recommend!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2022
A
And So It Goes
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 1
Pop culture: yoga, croases, costumes, tattoos of sacred symbols …is not religious appropiation.
Format: Hardcover
Neither are Christmas trees, a pagan tradition, except to religious fundamentalists. Religion, all religions … which are all patriarchal by origin and definition is to be challenged for hypocrisy … see Madonna for in your face pop blasphemy. This is not scholarship.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2023
K
Verified Purchase
Keith Hansen
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
An Invitation to Better Dialogue
Format: Paperback
Perry Schmidt-Leukel has tackled one of the most difficult intellectual minefields of all - religious pluralism. I admire his attempt, desire and intentions. This work is based off of a 2015 Gifford lecture in Glasgow. Religious Pluralism is one of the three possible stances that address the Problem of Religious Diversity. The other two stances are significantly more common and also close sisters - Exclusivism and Inclusivism. Pluralism is the most radical stance but also one most needed in a globally-connected world with seemingly ineradicable conflict and violence. One can safely ignore, by the way, the stance that all religions are nothing but projections of immature minds (Naturalism); this is a gaslighting position which tries to throw the baby out with the bathwater and does not really address the issue of religious diversity. Religion should be treated with the seriousness it is due and humans are inherently homo religiosus as history and culture attest. There are several reasons why Pluralism should be considered the superior stance. First, it is the most pragmatic as alluded to in my above statement on conflict. Second, if one understands Truth as something that no human or group of humans can ever have a monopoly on then Pluralism makes more sense than the other two. I should add that we should approach understanding of Truth more as a peregrination than as some fixed or static destination. Third, much of religious diversity is due to historical, cultural and especially linguistic differences but if we spend time in interreligious dialogue, we can begin to see that the religions are often saying the same things but using different jargon. The jargon should not be confused with Reality or Truth. As humans, we must continually be humbled by our lowly ability to understand reality as it is in itself and our immense limitations of language. Language too often creates division and can also circumscribe our ability to understand. Yet, it is all we really have to communicate with. Perry spends some time first outlining what a program of sustained interreligious dialogue would look like and some foundational principles. He then addresses some of the biggest elephants in the room - The Son, The Prophet and The Buddha - and how we can approach possible reconciliation, or at least how we can begin to frame the discussion. The other main issue is the problem of a Creator God in Buddhism. If I were to offer a point of criticism to Perry's approach it is that he does not include in his discussion Philosophical Religions such as Platonism/Neoplatonism and Panentheism. However, I understand that would have really complicated things and he clearly wanted to only focus on the main traditional religions. Perry then finishes up with a very fresh and thought-provoking discussion on a fractal interpretation of religion. That may be the most profound chapter of the book. The book is full of insight but should be taken as only an overview (albeit a very good one) and a hopeful beginning to more in-depth analysis and discussion. I look forward to reading more from Schmidt-Leukel and I hope more people can move from their exclusivist and inherently conflict-bound view of the world to a more peaceful and uniting view of the very same one reality we are all experiencing and are all a small part of.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Alan Race
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Pluralism as a positive good
Format: Paperback
Anyone iterested in how religions might think of their co-religionists should read this book. It pushes at the boundaries of settled views and points the way to a different future for interreligious relations. One of the best books on the fiedl for some time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2017

recommand products